Naming It Without Claiming It

Have you ever caught yourself saying something about your health that you've said so many times, you've stopped hearing it?

"I've always had a bad back." "Everyone in my family has high blood pressure." "My labs are normal, so it must be in my head."

In today's episode of Truth in Motion, we started a new week by asking what makes a question meaningful. And I shared something I keep coming back to: every question we ask stands on answers we've already accepted. What is real. How we know. What we're made for. Most of us never chose those answers. They were handed to us.

In the weeks ahead, I want us to slow down and look at those answers together. We'll ask the questions underneath our questions and see why they matter. Some assumptions we can set down. Some we have to make just to ask a question at all. And as you learn to tell the difference, you may find your questions leading to answers that actually change how you live.

Today, I want to bring that a little closer to home.

The beliefs we carry

Some of the most powerful beliefs about our health don't feel like beliefs at all. They feel like facts. We picked them up from a parent, a doctor, a commercial, a hard season. We repeat them until they start to become our truth.

And beliefs shape what we do. If you believe pain is just part of getting older, you may stop looking for a cause. If you believe there's no evidence for something, you may never ask what the evidence actually says, or whether "unknown" has been mistaken for "useless."

A meaningful question can open what a belief has quietly closed.

Naming it without claiming it

Many of us live in a world that values focusing on what we want. "Don't claim that diagnosis." "Don't give it energy." I understand that. What we expect does shape what happens in our bodies, and labels can become identities.

But looking honestly at something isn't the same as agreeing to be defined by it. When Jesus met a man who had been sick for thirty-eight years, he didn't pretend the illness wasn't there. He asked, "Do you want to be made well?" He named what was, and turned the man toward what could be.

You can do the same. You can name what's true today and still hold onto what you want to be true tomorrow. Both can live in you at once, and you may find that naming it honestly actually makes it easier to move.

A practice for today

Last week, we noticed. This week, we question.

Take ten minutes. Get a notebook. Write by hand if you can.

1. Write down one belief you hold about your health. Choose one you've said out loud more than once.

2. Underneath it, write: Where did I get this? Was it a person, a moment, a test result, a feeling?

3. Then write: Is it true? Not "Could it be true?" or "Has it felt true?" Just, is it true, as far as I honestly know today?

4. Notice how your body feels as you write. Tight? Lighter? Curious?

You don't have to change anything yet. Simply looking is enough for today. As you look, you may begin to notice the belief loosening its grip on its own.

Words to Carry

- I can look honestly and still hold hope.

- My questions are welcome.

- I choose which beliefs I keep.

- Naming something does not mean it owns me.

- I am open to answers that surprise me.

Come back tomorrow, when we ask what science actually is, and what falls inside and outside its reach.

With you every step of the way,

Dr. Jocelyn

References

Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. (1989). Preliminary report: Effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 321(6), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198908103210629

Ebell, M. H., Sokol, R., Lee, A., Simons, C., & Early, J. (2017). How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? Evidence-Based Medicine, 22(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2017-110704

Fanaroff, A. C., Califf, R. M., Windecker, S., Smith, S. C., Jr., & Lopes, R. D. (2019). Levels of evidence supporting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines, 2008–2018. JAMA, 321(11), 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1122

Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6

Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261

Lo, J., Long, M., Wallace, R., Salaga, M., & Pestaina, K. (2025). Claims denials and appeals in ACA Marketplace plans in 2023. KFF. https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/claims-denials-and-appeals-in-aca-marketplace-plans-in-2023/

Marshall, B. J., Armstrong, J. A., McGechie, D. B., & Glancy, R. J. (1985). Attempt to fulfil Koch's postulates for pyloric Campylobacter. Medical Journal of Australia, 142(8), 436–439.

Prasad, V., Vandross, A., Toomey, C., Cheung, M., Rho, J., Quinn, S., Chacko, S. J., Borkar, D., Gall, V., Selvaraj, S., Ho, N., & Cifu, A. (2013). A decade of reversal: An analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88(8), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.012

Ramakrishnan, K., & Salinas, R. C. (2007). Peptic ulcer disease. American Family Physician, 76(7), 1005–1012.

Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

Slawson, D. C., Shaughnessy, A. F., & Bennett, J. H. (1994). Becoming a medical information master: Feeling good about not knowing everything. Journal of Family Practice, 38(5), 505–513.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. (2022). Some Medicare Advantage organization denials of prior authorization requests raise concerns about beneficiary access to medically necessary care (Report No. OEI-09-18-00260).

Bacon, F. (2000). The new organon (L. Jardine & M. Silverthorne, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1620)

Berkeley, G. (1982). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge (K. P. Winkler, Ed.). Hackett. (Original work published 1710)

Dispenza, J. (2012). Breaking the habit of being yourself: How to lose your mind and create a new one. Hay House.

Dispenza, J. (2014). You are the placebo: Making your mind matter. Hay House.

The Holy Bible, New King James Version. (1982). Thomas Nelson.

Welwood, J. (1984). Principles of inner work: Psychological and spiritual. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 16(1), 63–73.